With
Vs.
What is taught:
The Four Conflicts of Literature
Person Vs. Person
Person Vs. Self
Person Vs. Society
Person Vs. Nature
-
The competing colors, animal logos, impassioned talking heads, and giant screens running 24/7 demonstrate the Superbowlification of politics and the outcome of Conflict Thinking. It’s primitive thinking. It’s Us Vs. Them. When applied to the basics, such as education, healthcare, and community, Conflict Thinking pits us against each other and our fear.
-
The Four Compromises of Literature are taught:
Person With Person
Person With Self
Person With Society
Person With Nature
The shift to compromise and With Thinking laid the foundation for creating bonds between two ideas on how they compliment each other rather than how they agitate each other. When applied to the basics, such as education, healthcare, and community, Compromise Thinking establishes relationships, reliability, and safety.
